Friday, September 26, 2014 INTERNATIONAL

Skip Navigation Links
SUPPLEMENT

Visitor Login










Protect Sri Lanka’s national interest from big power rivalries

Jehan Perera in Colombo

It may have been due to serendipity that the visits of Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and China’s President Xi Jinping occurred within a fortnight of each other.  As a result there seemed to be a competition between these two economic giants to be more generous to Sri Lanka.  If China has reached the number one spot in terms of economic assistance to Sri Lanka today, Japan has historically been the most generous to the country in the long haul since Independence in 1958.  Almost all of Japanese assistance has come in the form of outright grants or concessional and low interest loans.  Therefore a basic sense of gratitude, which Sri Lankans are known to possess, would dictate that Sri Lanka’s leaders should be sensitive to Japanese concerns.  This requires mindfulness on the part of Sri Lanka’s leaders.
While the Prime Minister of Japan, Shinzo Abe was in Sri Lanka, the first Japanese prime minister to visit the country in 24 years, a Chinese warship and a submarine docked in the Colombo International Container Terminal (CICT) at the Colombo Port.  According to media reports the two People’s Liberation Army (PLA)-Navy vessels were berthed from September 7 to 13 and left Colombo Port for international waters on September 13, three days prior to the Chinese President’s arrival.  The media also reported that the two PLA naval vessels were due in Colombo again in October and thereafter in November and has sought official clearance for these visits with approval already being granted. It was after a two week hiatus that the mainstream media reported the entry into Colombo Port of these naval vessels. 
It may have been a coincidence that the entry of the Chinese naval vessels into Sri Lanka occurred during the visit of the Japanese Prime Minister.  It may also have been the case that the entry of the Chinese ships into Colombo Port during the visit of the Japanese Prime Minister was beyond Sri Lanka’s control.  Japanese concerns were made clear in the joint statement of Prime Minister Abe and President Rajapaksa at the conclusion of the Japanese Prime Minister’s visit to Sri Lanka on September 7, the day the Chinese ships entered into Colombo Port. The significance of Sri Lanka’s physical location was a prominent feature of the Japan-Sri Lanka Joint Statement.  It pointedly referred to Sri Lanka’s geographical relationship to the sea and was titled “A new partnership between maritime countries.” 
The very first item in the Joint Statement referred to “the strategic geographical location of Sri Lanka in the Indian Ocean sea lanes straddling Asia and Africa.  Bearing in mind the importance of ensuring the freedom and safety of navigation in the region, the two leaders decided to establish the Sri Lanka-Japan dialogue on maritime security and oceanic issues in order to effectively address issues of mutual interest in oceanic issues.”  Only thereafter, having made the point about international naval security issues, did the joint statement refer to issues of Sri Lanka’s national reconciliation and trade and investment.  There is an importance that Sri Lanka has that exceeds its economic potential that both the visiting heads of government spoke about. Sri Lanka possesses a strategic location at the bottom of the Asian continent that looks into the Indian Ocean.

Deepening involvement
The priority given in the Japan-Sri Lanka Joint Statement on maritime issues of freedom of sea lanes would seem to reflect the larger international concerns about China’s growing investments in Sri Lanka and its physical presence in the ports of the country.  One of the flagship Chinese projects is the reclamation of 223 hectares land from the sea to build Colombo Port City at a cost of USD 1.4 billion.  While the Chinese will bear this cost, they will get 20 hectares of land free hold in perpetuity and another 88 hectares on a 99 year lease.  This might seem to be a worthwhile economic price to pay, but it also has a diplomatic cost as this grant of land to China in the Indian Ocean itself is bound to cause concern with countries who are also dependent on the security of the shipping lanes off the Indian Ocean, most notably India.
China has invested heavily in the construction of the new Hambantota Port in which it will have control over 4 of the 7 berths for 35 years and a majority of 53 per cent of the shares in the company that will operate the port.  A section of the Colombo Port is managed today by this Chinese government company which would enable Chinese interests to be given priority in that part of the port.  The Colombo International Container Terminals (CICT) is a joint venture between China Merchants Holdings International and the Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA), and was launched by President Mahinda Rajapaksa in April this year with the opening of a 46-metre main control tower equipped with state-of-the-art technology.
During the visit of the Chinese President Xi Jinping the two countries signed 27 agreements which would further the cooperation between them.  In addition, there are reports of other agreements which are not known to the public.  Among the 27 agreements signed by Sri Lanka and China were ones concerning not only further development of Hambantota Port and reclaiming land for Colombo Port City mega-project, but also other economic and technical cooperation, power and energy, agriculture, healthcare, urban development, highways and road development, maritime and marine research, media and arts and science and education.  This Chinese governmental involvement in Sri Lanka compensates for the limited investment by international private sector companies in the Sri Lankan economy that keep going elsewhere to the Asian regions, particularly to neighbouring India and to rapidly growing countries such as Vietnam rather than coming to Sri Lanka.   
The economics of these Chinese led projects, which are not based on market calculations, but rather on government to government negotiations, are not known.   Some of the economic indicators are not so positive, as evident in the Chinese-built Mattala International Airport which cannot cover even its operating costs, let alone pay back on the massive loans taken.  The issues for Sri Lanka will arise when these debts fall due and it is payback time.  At that point of time, it will be necessary for political goodwill to prevail over economic obligations.  This is also where Sri Lanka’s national interests can clash with its economic indebtedness.  Therefore, in order to become a less indebted and middle income country with self-sustaining growth, it is also important for Sri Lanka to diversify its sources of investment funding and include the sophisticated economic and democratic practices of Japan, India and the Western countries.

Political reconciliation
One key reason why foreign direct investment from international private sector companies has been so limited in Sri Lanka is its failure to make the transition from being a post-war country, one in which there is no war, to being a post-conflict country in which there is political reconciliation.  Unlike governments which invest in other countries with geopolitical and strategic considerations in mind, private sector companies are mindful of investing their funds in countries which have not resolved their long standing internal conflicts which can once again erupt to lead to human rights violations and breakdowns in law and order.  It is therefore important for Sri Lanka’s future that it reaches reconciliation within itself, which is the surest way to woo foreign direct investment and to put a stop to international pressure by foreign governments and human rights organizations which deter such foreign direct investment.
The second item in the Joint Statement between Sri Lanka and Japan made specific mention of what needs to be done.  “Prime Minister Abe, while recognizing the progress made so far, reiterated the importance of dialogue among all stakeholders for national reconciliation and further efforts to promote the implementation of the National Plan of Action on the recommendations of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC). He also highly appreciated the specific actions such as holding the election of the Northern Provincial Council in September 2013, submitting to Parliament the Bill on Assistance to and Protection of Victims and Witnesses, finalizing the report of the Joint Needs Assessment on resettled IDPs, and expanding the mandate of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry on Missing Persons including the establishment of an Advisory Council comprising internationally recognized persons of eminence as domestic initiatives.”
While welcoming Chinese offers of support, Sri Lanka also needs to transcend its past war, and heal the wounds of war through national reconciliation on the lines agreed to with Japan. In the joint statement with Japan, President Rajapaksa reiterated his government’s ongoing engagement with the international community and the United Nations system and Prime Minister Abe welcomed the continuing engagement of the Government of Sri Lanka, in particular with the Human Rights Council and its mechanisms, and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), and its willingness to conduct high-level dialogues with the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the invitation extended to him to visit Sri Lanka during 2014. There is no doubt that the Sri Lankan government would value Chinese President Xi Jinping’s pledge to stand by Sri Lanka and protect it in international forums.
China has been a most friendly and supportive country to Sri Lanka.  Successive Sri Lankan governments have had close relations with China beginning with the government of Sri Lanka’s first Prime Minister the sagacious D S Senanayake who entered into the Rubber Rice Pact of 1952 in defiance of the United States which sought to isolate China at that time.  China also gave invaluable military assistance to Sri Lanka during its long war. There is no disputing that Sri Lanka has a duty to be grateful to China for all it has done in the past and what it is doing in the present.  But care must be taken that this sense of gratitude will not be at the expense of other countries that have also been supportive of Sri Lanka and which are important to Sri Lanka’s wellbeing.  This would include Japan and India, both of which have security and regional big power concerns about China.  Ignoring their concerns must not be at the expense of Sri Lanka’s own national interests.

Comment

Jehan Perera in Colombo

It may have been due to serendipity that the visits of Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and China’s President Xi Jinping occurred within a fortnight of each other.  As a result there seemed to be a competition between these two economic giants to be more generous to Sri Lanka.  If China has reached the number one spot in terms of economic assistance to Sri Lanka today, Japan has historically been the most generous to the country in the long haul since Independence in 1958.  Almost all of Japanese assistance has come in the form of outright grants or concessional and low interest loans.  Therefore a basic sense of gratitude, which Sri Lankans are known to possess, would dictate that Sri Lanka’s leaders should be sensitive to Japanese concerns.  This requires mindfulness on the part of Sri Lanka’s leaders.
While the Prime Minister of Japan, Shinzo Abe was in Sri Lanka, the first Japanese prime minister to visit the country in 24 years, a Chinese warship and a submarine docked in the Colombo International Container Terminal (CICT) at the Colombo Port.  According to media reports the two People’s Liberation Army (PLA)-Navy vessels were berthed from September 7 to 13 and left Colombo Port for international waters on September 13, three days prior to the Chinese President’s arrival.  The media also reported that the two PLA naval vessels were due in Colombo again in October and thereafter in November and has sought official clearance for these visits with approval already being granted. It was after a two week hiatus that the mainstream media reported the entry into Colombo Port of these naval vessels. 
It may have been a coincidence that the entry of the Chinese naval vessels into Sri Lanka occurred during the visit of the Japanese Prime Minister.  It may also have been the case that the entry of the Chinese ships into Colombo Port during the visit of the Japanese Prime Minister was beyond Sri Lanka’s control.  Japanese concerns were made clear in the joint statement of Prime Minister Abe and President Rajapaksa at the conclusion of the Japanese Prime Minister’s visit to Sri Lanka on September 7, the day the Chinese ships entered into Colombo Port. The significance of Sri Lanka’s physical location was a prominent feature of the Japan-Sri Lanka Joint Statement.  It pointedly referred to Sri Lanka’s geographical relationship to the sea and was titled “A new partnership between maritime countries.” 
The very first item in the Joint Statement referred to “the strategic geographical location of Sri Lanka in the Indian Ocean sea lanes straddling Asia and Africa.  Bearing in mind the importance of ensuring the freedom and safety of navigation in the region, the two leaders decided to establish the Sri Lanka-Japan dialogue on maritime security and oceanic issues in order to effectively address issues of mutual interest in oceanic issues.”  Only thereafter, having made the point about international naval security issues, did the joint statement refer to issues of Sri Lanka’s national reconciliation and trade and investment.  There is an importance that Sri Lanka has that exceeds its economic potential that both the visiting heads of government spoke about. Sri Lanka possesses a strategic location at the bottom of the Asian continent that looks into the Indian Ocean.

Deepening involvement
The priority given in the Japan-Sri Lanka Joint Statement on maritime issues of freedom of sea lanes would seem to reflect the larger international concerns about China’s growing investments in Sri Lanka and its physical presence in the ports of the country.  One of the flagship Chinese projects is the reclamation of 223 hectares land from the sea to build Colombo Port City at a cost of USD 1.4 billion.  While the Chinese will bear this cost, they will get 20 hectares of land free hold in perpetuity and another 88 hectares on a 99 year lease.  This might seem to be a worthwhile economic price to pay, but it also has a diplomatic cost as this grant of land to China in the Indian Ocean itself is bound to cause concern with countries who are also dependent on the security of the shipping lanes off the Indian Ocean, most notably India.
China has invested heavily in the construction of the new Hambantota Port in which it will have control over 4 of the 7 berths for 35 years and a majority of 53 per cent of the shares in the company that will operate the port.  A section of the Colombo Port is managed today by this Chinese government company which would enable Chinese interests to be given priority in that part of the port.  The Colombo International Container Terminals (CICT) is a joint venture between China Merchants Holdings International and the Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA), and was launched by President Mahinda Rajapaksa in April this year with the opening of a 46-metre main control tower equipped with state-of-the-art technology.
During the visit of the Chinese President Xi Jinping the two countries signed 27 agreements which would further the cooperation between them.  In addition, there are reports of other agreements which are not known to the public.  Among the 27 agreements signed by Sri Lanka and China were ones concerning not only further development of Hambantota Port and reclaiming land for Colombo Port City mega-project, but also other economic and technical cooperation, power and energy, agriculture, healthcare, urban development, highways and road development, maritime and marine research, media and arts and science and education.  This Chinese governmental involvement in Sri Lanka compensates for the limited investment by international private sector companies in the Sri Lankan economy that keep going elsewhere to the Asian regions, particularly to neighbouring India and to rapidly growing countries such as Vietnam rather than coming to Sri Lanka.   
The economics of these Chinese led projects, which are not based on market calculations, but rather on government to government negotiations, are not known.   Some of the economic indicators are not so positive, as evident in the Chinese-built Mattala International Airport which cannot cover even its operating costs, let alone pay back on the massive loans taken.  The issues for Sri Lanka will arise when these debts fall due and it is payback time.  At that point of time, it will be necessary for political goodwill to prevail over economic obligations.  This is also where Sri Lanka’s national interests can clash with its economic indebtedness.  Therefore, in order to become a less indebted and middle income country with self-sustaining growth, it is also important for Sri Lanka to diversify its sources of investment funding and include the sophisticated economic and democratic practices of Japan, India and the Western countries.

Political reconciliation
One key reason why foreign direct investment from international private sector companies has been so limited in Sri Lanka is its failure to make the transition from being a post-war country, one in which there is no war, to being a post-conflict country in which there is political reconciliation.  Unlike governments which invest in other countries with geopolitical and strategic considerations in mind, private sector companies are mindful of investing their funds in countries which have not resolved their long standing internal conflicts which can once again erupt to lead to human rights violations and breakdowns in law and order.  It is therefore important for Sri Lanka’s future that it reaches reconciliation within itself, which is the surest way to woo foreign direct investment and to put a stop to international pressure by foreign governments and human rights organizations which deter such foreign direct investment.
The second item in the Joint Statement between Sri Lanka and Japan made specific mention of what needs to be done.  “Prime Minister Abe, while recognizing the progress made so far, reiterated the importance of dialogue among all stakeholders for national reconciliation and further efforts to promote the implementation of the National Plan of Action on the recommendations of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC). He also highly appreciated the specific actions such as holding the election of the Northern Provincial Council in September 2013, submitting to Parliament the Bill on Assistance to and Protection of Victims and Witnesses, finalizing the report of the Joint Needs Assessment on resettled IDPs, and expanding the mandate of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry on Missing Persons including the establishment of an Advisory Council comprising internationally recognized persons of eminence as domestic initiatives.”
While welcoming Chinese offers of support, Sri Lanka also needs to transcend its past war, and heal the wounds of war through national reconciliation on the lines agreed to with Japan. In the joint statement with Japan, President Rajapaksa reiterated his government’s ongoing engagement with the international community and the United Nations system and Prime Minister Abe welcomed the continuing engagement of the Government of Sri Lanka, in particular with the Human Rights Council and its mechanisms, and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), and its willingness to conduct high-level dialogues with the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the invitation extended to him to visit Sri Lanka during 2014. There is no doubt that the Sri Lankan government would value Chinese President Xi Jinping’s pledge to stand by Sri Lanka and protect it in international forums.
China has been a most friendly and supportive country to Sri Lanka.  Successive Sri Lankan governments have had close relations with China beginning with the government of Sri Lanka’s first Prime Minister the sagacious D S Senanayake who entered into the Rubber Rice Pact of 1952 in defiance of the United States which sought to isolate China at that time.  China also gave invaluable military assistance to Sri Lanka during its long war. There is no disputing that Sri Lanka has a duty to be grateful to China for all it has done in the past and what it is doing in the present.  But care must be taken that this sense of gratitude will not be at the expense of other countries that have also been supportive of Sri Lanka and which are important to Sri Lanka’s wellbeing.  This would include Japan and India, both of which have security and regional big power concerns about China.  Ignoring their concerns must not be at the expense of Sri Lanka’s own national interests.


Login to post comments


(0)



 ISLAMABAD DIARY

Movie Dukhtar tingles with excitement

Jonaid Iqbal

After a heated summer full of politics and protest sit-ins, which has now gone on for 45 days and to which the Islamabad public has become used to, the screening of movie Daughter, (‘Dukhtar’ in Persian and Urdu) is good news.
The movie tingles with excitement since it follows in the best 21st century tradition and brings cheer to a harried public who now contemplate the economic cost of the dharna (sit-in), loss of investment, the on-going strike Zarb Azb, plight of displaced IDPs from Waziristian and floods
The movie Dukhtar, had Pakistan premier on 18 September. All indictors say it is doing roaring business in nine movie theatres:  at Islamabad, as well as in Faisalabad, Gujranwala. Hyderabad, Lahore, Karachi, Multan Rawalpindi and Lahore.
Earlier, this movie was screened at the Toronto International Film Festival where it received good reception there, and is now selected as entry from Pakistan for Oscar award competition in the category of foreign movies – no doubt it marks another success for resurgent Pakistani cinema.

A sure sign
Dukhtar can be included in the list of successful Pakistani films made during the past three years. The  success list includes ‘Khuda Ke Liye’, ’Bol’,’ Zinda Bhag’, ‘Waar’, ‘Main Hun Shahid Afridi’  to earn international rating. A sure sign of the film industry rising.
Significantly,except for director Shoab Mansoor’s ‘Bol and Khuda Key Liye, these three movies were directed and produced by amateurs. Among them is included Sharmeen Obaid Chinoy’s 2012 movie ‘Saving Face’ made abroad. Yet the content and context of Chinoy’s movie is focused on things at home such as the horrible abuse of acid thrown on women faces.
A Lahore girl, graduate in the art of cinematography from the Columbia University, Afia Nathaniel, created the story of Dukhtar, and she also directed  the film.
The plot centres on a mother and her 10-year old daughter who leave their home to save the girl from an arranged marriage with a tribal leader. It deals with swara, a gruesome custom, in which a girl is given away in marriage to settle a blood feud, rather an exchange child bride. In a way, the movie is loaded with social [as well as] political issue. Set in the tribal area, the future of mother and daughter is doomed among gun-carrying tribal people
Samiya Mumtaz (Allah Rakhi), Mohib Miorza (Sohail), Saleha Aref (Zainab), Asif Khan(Daulat Khan), Ajab Gul (Shahbaz Khan), Abdullah Jan( Tor Gul)  and Samina Ahmad (Rukhsana) are the main actors and actresses.

Plentiful reward
One can say that there is plentiful reward for those who watch the movie, including scrutinizing the stunning landscape of Gilgit – Baltistsan province in FATA where the movie was produced.
The plot is strong and there is fabulous music to entertain an appreciative crowd, with songs sung by famous Pakistani crooner Rahat Fateh Ali Khan.
Director Afia has this to say about the movie: “This is a beautiful film for a beautiful heart.”
 The movie industry in this country has made significant progress since the Indo-Pak war of 1965 when Indian movies were discouraged, providing impetus for the film industry to progress. In that interlude the industry produced a number of remarkably successful movies. However, the industry again became sick with renewed import of Indian films and film theatres of this country have either been closed to make way for glittering plazas or wedding halls. Now cineplexes have come up that screen best of international and Pakistani movies. Now there are only existing 30 movie theatres; in 1992 Pakistan had over 600 movie houses.
At present less than two dozen films are produced, though since 2013 people are again talking of resurgence of Pakistani cinema.

Comment

Jonaid Iqbal

After a heated summer full of politics and protest sit-ins, which has now gone on for 45 days and to which the Islamabad public has become used to, the screening of movie Daughter, (‘Dukhtar’ in Persian and Urdu) is good news.
The movie tingles with excitement since it follows in the best 21st century tradition and brings cheer to a harried public who now contemplate the economic cost of the dharna (sit-in), loss of investment, the on-going strike Zarb Azb, plight of displaced IDPs from Waziristian and floods
The movie Dukhtar, had Pakistan premier on 18 September. All indictors say it is doing roaring business in nine movie theatres:  at Islamabad, as well as in Faisalabad, Gujranwala. Hyderabad, Lahore, Karachi, Multan Rawalpindi and Lahore.
Earlier, this movie was screened at the Toronto International Film Festival where it received good reception there, and is now selected as entry from Pakistan for Oscar award competition in the category of foreign movies – no doubt it marks another success for resurgent Pakistani cinema.

A sure sign
Dukhtar can be included in the list of successful Pakistani films made during the past three years. The  success list includes ‘Khuda Ke Liye’, ’Bol’,’ Zinda Bhag’, ‘Waar’, ‘Main Hun Shahid Afridi’  to earn international rating. A sure sign of the film industry rising.
Significantly,except for director Shoab Mansoor’s ‘Bol and Khuda Key Liye, these three movies were directed and produced by amateurs. Among them is included Sharmeen Obaid Chinoy’s 2012 movie ‘Saving Face’ made abroad. Yet the content and context of Chinoy’s movie is focused on things at home such as the horrible abuse of acid thrown on women faces.
A Lahore girl, graduate in the art of cinematography from the Columbia University, Afia Nathaniel, created the story of Dukhtar, and she also directed  the film.
The plot centres on a mother and her 10-year old daughter who leave their home to save the girl from an arranged marriage with a tribal leader. It deals with swara, a gruesome custom, in which a girl is given away in marriage to settle a blood feud, rather an exchange child bride. In a way, the movie is loaded with social [as well as] political issue. Set in the tribal area, the future of mother and daughter is doomed among gun-carrying tribal people
Samiya Mumtaz (Allah Rakhi), Mohib Miorza (Sohail), Saleha Aref (Zainab), Asif Khan(Daulat Khan), Ajab Gul (Shahbaz Khan), Abdullah Jan( Tor Gul)  and Samina Ahmad (Rukhsana) are the main actors and actresses.

Plentiful reward
One can say that there is plentiful reward for those who watch the movie, including scrutinizing the stunning landscape of Gilgit – Baltistsan province in FATA where the movie was produced.
The plot is strong and there is fabulous music to entertain an appreciative crowd, with songs sung by famous Pakistani crooner Rahat Fateh Ali Khan.
Director Afia has this to say about the movie: “This is a beautiful film for a beautiful heart.”
 The movie industry in this country has made significant progress since the Indo-Pak war of 1965 when Indian movies were discouraged, providing impetus for the film industry to progress. In that interlude the industry produced a number of remarkably successful movies. However, the industry again became sick with renewed import of Indian films and film theatres of this country have either been closed to make way for glittering plazas or wedding halls. Now cineplexes have come up that screen best of international and Pakistani movies. Now there are only existing 30 movie theatres; in 1992 Pakistan had over 600 movie houses.
At present less than two dozen films are produced, though since 2013 people are again talking of resurgence of Pakistani cinema.


Login to post comments


(0)



METROPOLITAN
EDITORIAL
COMMENTS
INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS
INFOTECH
CULTURE
MISCELLANY
AVIATOUR
LETTERS
LAST WORD
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation
UNAoC pioneering role
6TH GLOBAL FORUM OF THE UN ALLIANCE OF CIVILIZATIONS Highlights of Statement  by H.E. Iyad A. Madani
OIC’s antidote to Clash of Civilizations
Indonesian President on OIC endeavours
Update: September 15, 2014 OIC dairy September 1 to 14 IRCICA special event (OIC’s Istanbul Research Centre for Islamic history, Culture and Art,) at the Sixth Global Forum of the Alliance of Civilizations Bali, 29 August 2014.
Update: September 15, 2014 OIC Secretary General in Uganda FIGHTING EBOLA, ERADICATING POVERTY, AND CONFRONTING EXTREMISM
Update: September 15, 2014 Palestine & Al-Quds Affairs
Update: September 15, 2014 World Summit on Media for Children
Update: September 15, 2014 UN Training Program, Mali Peace Negotiation & EU consultations
Update: September 15, 2014 NEW IRAQI GOVERNMENT OIC welcome development
Update: September 15, 2014 Danish Foreign Minister at the OIC
  OIC dairy 15 to 28 September   OIC-EU agreement to settle a common grounds for partnership  
   OIC dairy 15 to 28 September   OIC Secretary General in Chicago
 OIC dairy 15 to 28 September   Role of faith in care of reproductive & sexual health
 OIC dairy 15 to 28 September   OIC Islamophobia Observatory August Report released to Press Decline in incidents but disturbing manifestations  
 OIC dairy 15 to 28 September   69th UN General Assembly OIC Secretary General conducts series of sideline meetings  
 OIC dairy 15 to 28 September   National Unity government in Afghanistan
 OIC dairy 15 to 28 September   OIC Secretary General talks to US Secretary of State
 OIC dairy 15 to 28 September   OIC Contact Group meeting on Ebola menace
 OIC dairy 15 to 28 September   OIC welcomes Obama’s call to confront extremist ideology
 OIC dairy 15 to 28 September   ROHINGYA ISSUE OIC Secretary General meets Myanmar Foreign Minister  
 OIC dairy 15 to 28 September  Developing global goodwill OIC Secretary General meets the Foreign Ministers of Russia and China  
 OIC dairy 15 to 28 September   OIC meeting on Ebola in Geneva
FOUNDING EDITOR: ENAYETULLAH KHAN; EDITOR: SAYED KAMALUDDIN
Contents Copyrighted © by Holiday Publication Limited
Mailing address 30, Tejgaon Industrial Area, Dhaka-1208, Bangladesh.
Phone 880-2-8170462, 8170463, 8170464 Fax 880-2-9127927 Email holiday@bangla.net
Site Managed By: Southtech Limited
Southtech Limited does not take any responsibility for any news content of this site